Trackback from A Piece of Trash:

Why, if they can call us deviants, can't we call them homophobes? That's really what they are! ...

Trackback from You don't have to be anti-gay to be Christian:

We Christians may think homosexual activity is a sin, but that is a definition that is exclusively Christian. It is not all-encompassing, nor convincingly factual enough for non-Christians to understand. ...

Trackback from public dialogue on christian perspectives on homosexuality, may 10, singapore:

For the first time in Singapore, Christians from both sides of the camp, including two heavyweight theologians, will share their perspectives on the controversial issue at a dialogue session organised by a gay Christian group....

Trackback from the art of dumbspeak:

Lee essentially sounded no different from the rest of the moral panickers who fear the day that sex between two consenting adult males would be legal......

Trackback from No place for discrimination in Singapore: A reply to Yvonne Lee:

The ability to choose defines one's sense of being. It is the right of an individual to self-determination. Take it away and you are left with a corpus without spirit or mind....

Trackback from innersanctum:

While I respect her right to hold her opinion, her conclusions were not the same as the conclusions the researchers she apparently quoted from. ...

Trackback from Angry Doctor:

But why let a simple fact like that stop us doctors from using our expert professional opinion to help put those sick, sick people away for the rest of their lives, right?...

Trackback from Lost in a fog of fear:

The government may think that in politics, opposition, however irrational, cannot be ignored. This despite many people pointing out ... that the so-called "opposition" is more narrowly-based and religiously-driven than commonly supposed....

Trackback from Beware the Slippery Slope!:

Perhaps the silliest slippery slope argument to date is the bunch of comical assertions recently put forward by Assistant Professor Yvonne Lee from NUS Law School (writing in her personal capacity)....

Trackback from Right to be Gay:

Homosexuality clashes with “fundamental liberties” such as free speech and religious liberty – This argument simply does not make sense....

Trackback from Fight of Faith:

There is an excellent article by Yvonne Lee in The Straits Times Review section today. Pls take time to read it. She is an assistant professor in the Faculty of Law, NUS....

Trackback from theology professor supports repeal of anti-gay law in singapore:

Subjectivity is where it begins and ends. One gets the feeling that even if they referred to scripture, it would be used as rationalisation to support what would be a profoundly personal set of beliefs....

Trackback from Rev Dr Yap Kim Hao: Christian perspectives on homosexuality:

And the controversial issue of homosexuality is no longer discussed. The teaching of the Bible leads to the teaching of the Church which then becomes official, and obedience is demanded....

Trackback from Rebutting Yvonne Lee, part 3:

It is unfortunate that she does not consider the citizenship of homosexuals, who pay taxes, obey the law, perform national service, and through their economic activity contribute to national wealth and provide employment to other citizens....

Trackback from Freedom to be Homophobic:

This is probably the most ludicrous turn in the whole letter. ... If you can make insinuations that homosexuality is immoral, why can't people say that you are homophobic....

Trackback from Angry NUS law lecturer hits MM Lee with big Bible:

So when MM Lee said that gays might deserve equal rights, she opened her mouth and pulled a big Bible out of it, and then started to hit MM Lee on the head with it....

Trackback from Frankenstein:

It's so funny! Imagine an astronaut coming back from Jupiter and telling people what he's seen, only for them to believe what some scientist says about Jupiter not existing instead....

Trackback from The Green Apple:

As a law professor, Yvonne Lee should have known better than to write such a pathetic article, filled with flawed arguments and semi-obvious fundamental discrimination against the homosexual community...

Trackback from What rubbish:

I loathe people who are sneaky about their real agenda while appearing to proselytize for the good of humankind. I'm all for free speech even if I don't agree with what you say. But I detest dishonesty....

Trackback from Underhanded tactics?:

Can you imagine the effect of flooding the average reader with a bunch of law terms, followed by some general sweeping statements?...

Trackback from Rebutting Yvonne Lee, part 2:

This is a loophole-ridden statement based on the fallacious notion that a campaign for societal approval should be the basis for criminality....

Trackback from New scare tactic: religious strife:

This is a new tactic. ... It plays on the government's fear of social disorder, particularly the kind that involves race and religion. By crying wolf, she might have been hoping to get the government's attention....

Trackback from Rebutting Yvonne Lee, part 1:

In addition, contrary to your argument that the law "should not facilitate acts which threaten public health", smoking is not banned in Singapore, despite high external costs to non-smokers and health-risks to the smokers themselves....

Trackback from Queen to K6:

I was even more shocked to see from the Straits Times' end-note that the writer teaches law at the National University of Singapore. This must be a national disgrace of some sort.

As someone asked on a mailing list -- does this qualify as hate speech?...

Trackback from love_joy_hope (aka, no love, no joy, no hope):

but seriously. its a perversion. and they are punished with aids you know. there are many references ^^ nevermind. should i just forget about the issue?...

Trackback from NMP Siew's response to Straits Times article on homosexuality:

But I do know that I was immensely disappointed that this piece was written by an assistant professor in the NUS Law Faculty, who also teaches constitutional law. She may know the law, but she has not, in this piece, demonstrated the ability to apply it....