November 19, 2005
Man's evolution from monkey a proven scientific fact?
yewjin said:
If the letter was an appeal for a more critical look at evolution that would be a applaudable point of view, but a religiously-motivated criticism sees things through tinted eyes, and here’s the frightening part, this FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) spreads.
Recommended by Anonymous Coward: "This article discusses and rebukes a recent forum letter that attacks the validity of evolution."
Trackback from Yawning Bread - attack of the creationists.:
I have argued again and again that our elites and our government are blindsided about fundamentalist Christianity, which in some ways is as dangerous as al-Qaeda ideology. ...
Trackback from Chrisloup:
a compilation of the forum letters...
Trackback from tinkertailor: The Evolution vs Intelligent Design Debate:
even though both sides have their share of good arguments, I’ve always felt a sense of dissatisfaction which I couldn’t quite put my finger on....
Trackback from LaxWyrical:
precisely what i think on this whole Intelligent Design vs Evolution debate. neat....
Trackback from Musings:
I would ... agree with those who say that a theory (ie. evolution) is not necessarily incorrect or invalid just because it cannot be conclusively proven. What is needed ... is more balanced approach ......
Trackback from Evolution and God:
I think that just as the intelligent design people have gotten the science part wrong, the evolution people have often misunderstood the philosophical implications of Darwinist theories....
Trackback from Recent Runes:
Then scientific alternatives to God should be included in Church sermons too....
Trackback from AlterNet: Jesus, Meet Evolution:
Exceedingly narrow and literalistic interpretations of that faith. The best way for Christians... is not to attack science... fulfill the full potential of Christianity itself....






Trackback from Agagooga: Man's evolution from monkey a proven scientific fact? ...: