Political openness - for PAP only

at82 — 2008-09-02T21:18:02+08:00

On Sunday, the PAP Community Foundation organised a ‘PAP carnival’ at West Coast Park. This was reported by the Straits Times on its front page, with a big picture of PM Lee on a bicycle. The event would be nothing out of the ordinary if not for one small detail: outdoor events by political parties are banned – or at least that is what the PAP Government itself says. This was explained in no uncertain terms in Parliament last year (2007) by the Senior Minister of State for Law and Home Affairs, Professor Ho Peng Kee, and carried in news reports by our mainstream press.

The ban, said Minister Ho, is a ‘longstanding one’ because ‘outdoor gatherings by parties have the potential to cause a public disturbance.’ (Straits Times).

Ho explained this in his reply to questions from the Workers’ Party MPs in Parliament, who asked why the WP’s application to hold a cycling event at East Coast Park was rejected by the police.

Recommended by at82: "If our society is ruled by two different sets of laws – or laws applied selectively - for different people or political parties, it cannot but fracture and disintegrate. "

Link

Double standards in court rulings?

2008-06-05T16:37:43+08:00

Kevin said:

"Is this the same court that rule in favour of the wife of an americian millionaire who was killed in a car accident when he deliberately violated the traffic laws?"

"Or perhaps it’s not about you at all. It seem to me that the verdict could have depends on who you are contesting against."

Recommended by Anonymous Coward: "Good comparison and exposure of double standards in court's verdicts."

Link

Tomorrow - Bulletin of Singapore Bloggers tag: double

Political openness - for PAP only

Double standards in court rulings?