This has being taken down until we have concrete evidence that this is not a fabricated information.

-James Seng

Yawning Bread said:

Firstly, the language used does not include the word "homosexuality", let alone "homosexual orientation". Instead it deploys spin, speaking of "homosexual lifestyle", thus suggesting that homosexual orientation is not integral to a person and reversible, much like other lifestyle matters, e.g. consuming too much transfat or wearing tinted contact lenses. I'm sure I don't have to repeat that such a view flies in the face of scientific consensus today. This deliberate framing of the issue in such scientifically unsupported terms immediately renders the integrity of the statement-makers -- church leaders donning the cloak of moral guides -- suspect.

Recommended by Anonymous Coward: "Yet another instance of how ONE religion wants to force feed its beliefs on an entire country."

Link

Trevvy said:

Thio's presence in the parliament could perhaps bring out both conservative and liberal views on not just homosexuality but the role of religion in public policy. In this present global climate where religion is making a comeback in politics, even secular Singapore is no safe harbour.

Recommended by Anonymous Coward: "Extremist religious views have just entered Parliament."

Link

豬小草 on church blogs:

去年，教會的網站因為系統商出問題而停擺，長執會開會決議要重新架一個網站-「因為年輕人有需要」，他們這麼說。於是從匆匆忙忙的，幾個同工開始討論起整個網站的架構跟版型。那個時候，我剛剛接觸blog，覺得如果教會能夠用這個比較友善的介面來架設網站的話，在更新跟維護上，是比較方便的。我在自己的blog上面寫了一篇討論這方面應用的文章(不過因為MINORITY BLOG掛站，找不到了)，也幫教會申請了一個blog、建個一個大概的框架。

Link