November 19, 2005

Man's evolution from monkey a proven scientific fact?

yewjin said:

If the letter was an appeal for a more critical look at evolution that would be a applaudable point of view, but a religiously-motivated criticism sees things through tinted eyes, and here’s the frightening part, this FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) spreads.

Recommended by Anonymous Coward: "This article discusses and rebukes a recent forum letter that attacks the validity of evolution."

Link

Submitted by Anonymous Coward on November 16//10:05pm and published by mb, tinkertailor :: 32825 reads | trackback (9)
Comments 384

ok im so confused right now. MY BRO AND DAD WE where talking about this and my bro said. "If man came from ape/ancestory, wuldnt all the monkeys/apes be gone, right. But then i said something about the dominant and recessive genes that the human gene might be to recessive for it to continue through the apes. But if the human gene became dominant wouldnt the evolution take even more time to devolp into something else. But if the punnet square would in which the human gene would be recessive then it would be a fourth of a percent that the human gene beavle to pass on but then that might nt happen again when or if the mate. The cycle could break and keep on restarting. If the cycle "multi/single cell organisme->something else and so one the chain can be broken when the genes r not beable to produse the living organism. Im just a confused teen who doesnt kno and is hating it for it. I do belive in god, but when i question the evolution i get confused i dont kno what to belive. PLZ comment on my accont to help understand more about this

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8