This was going to be long but I think it's better for me to write in point form.

1. This is both art and porn, but it is more porn than art. Just because it is art it doesn't make it less porn. Let's not obsfucate the issues here. We are talking about porn, not art.

2. The intent of SPG is clearly more porn than art. She put it there to show that she's "got it".

3. This is not really a worthy and meaningful topic. Shianux, you could have talked about 3rd world debt, the siblings in a miserable run down HDB flat, the civil war in the Congo, the proliferation of AIDS, but here we are talking about an overprivileged bourgeousie counter- revolutionary brat, displaying her (admittedly) well-endowed body. What gives?

4. There is nothing wrong with porn (that is this mild). You have the right to put up porn, but you don't have to do it. Similarly you have the right to chop off your own dick too, but you don't have to do it.

5. There are naked bodies everywhere, and this does not in any way herald a "nude, sorry, new age in blogging". ST is sensationalising this because its intrinsic nature is to be a media whore and not because there is anything about it we really have to hate.