April 28, 2009

Embrace Foreigners, and Screw the Locals(NSmen)

Conscript said:

All this talk about National Integration and integration of foreigners into Singapore misses the mark. We are talking about welcome others when we treat our own so poorly. What am I talking about?

I am talking about National Service. I am talking about mandatory 2 years (formerly 2.5 years) of conscription of Singaporean male citizens into the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), the Singapore Police Force (SPF) and the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF).

I am talking about the 10 years of reservist obligations comprising but not limited to:

* annual in-camp training lasting 2 to 21 days (in practice but legally up to 40 days under the law)
* annual individual physical proficiency tests (IPPT) for those medically fit NSmen (those who fail to clear their tests are subject to Remedial Training of twice/thrice a week)
* notifying Mindef Notification Centre for any overseas trips exceeding 24 hours
* need to apply for exit permit for trips of 6 months or longer
* annual operations manning or mobilisation exercises than can happen 2-3 times a year

To be male and Singaporean is to serve and f*** off
These obligations are not new. They have been imposed on NSmen since the whole NS system was developed just after Singapore gained independence and as the British withdrew their military forces out of Singapore not long after.

What is new is that the pace of immigration to Singapore has increased tremendously. It has created a truly global city, Singapore Inc, with the implications of a labour market that is competitive in every sense of the word.

Recommended by Anonymous Coward: "As a fellow reservist, I feel his pain too. Why are Singaporean men so cham? Our only wrong is to be born here in Singapore and get punished by government who embrace foreigners."

Link

Submitted by Anonymous Coward on April 27//3:01pm and published by jseng :: 3842 reads | trackback
Comments 32

Hi AC,

Thanks for featuring my post.

Majullah Singapura.

Panzer

Our only wrong is to be born here in Singapore and get punished by government who embrace foreigners.

That is incorrect. Your "wrong" is to have no balls to revolt against the oppressive regime that enslave its citizens and prostitute the country to foreigners. Your "wrong" is to wait for others to fight for your rights so that you don't have to risk your own ass.

Posted by chicken chicken* on 28 April, 2009 - 10:27am

Only a child would point out the King wears no clothes
-
`On one occasion, I asked S. K. Tan why he had slapped during the interrogation. He told me that I was mistaken. I had moved back and lost my balance`

fuck ns

What is there to embrace foreigners? Have you read the 200+ people went out to MOM for their workpermit get revoked just bcoz the empl did paid the levy. All these people have paid more than 6K almost their 2 years earning to come here. They are also foreigners, just don't see only Caucasians and high paying bankers as foreigners, even labours are foreigners.
If you don't like NS, put it through ur MP to govt. The policy may change when the majority proposes something new.

Posted by Dev* on 28 April, 2009 - 12:28pm

i'd agree with ur point here.

foreigners here also have their contributions to the country, though, in ur mind, their contributions might be as significant as ur NS.

but look at the issue from another point, u r the citizen of the country, u receive more benefit than those foreigners (u get bonus from government every year, but no for those foreigners, u can buy the hdb at a much lower price than those foreigners, and many others.). and also, u should also feel proud that u r serving NS to protect the country, dont u?

i can understand ur pain in the NS, but it is ur responsibility to protect the country, isnt it? if u dont do that, who gonna do that? u wont expect those foreigners to protect ur own country, will ya?

it should be the problem of the NS system, but not the foreigners!! as Dev* said, if u dont like NS, propose something different. If not, just accept it, and feel proud of it as u r protecting ur own country.

I wonder whose responsibility was it to keep Mas Selamat in detention and whose lapses was it that allowed him to escape? How come MHA/SPF is able to outsource to Gurkhas the responsibility of guarding Mas Selamat with the consequences?

The problem is that Singapore citizens are taken for granted. I am not against foreigners per se, I value the contributions of foreign labour who helped build Singapore's infrastructure. I am against spending so much resources on "integrating" foreigners i.e. foreigners who are given PR, foreigners who opted for Singapore Citizenship when we screw our own NSmen.

Yes, I receive more benefits that PRs, but I can get KILLED during reservist and I've seen one of my NSmen DIE during IPPT. You may not mind risking your life for that additional GST rebates/govt top-ups to medisave but I do.

I don't expect foreigners to protect the country. But I expected newly minted CITIZENS to do their fair share to national security beyond paying taxes. I also pay my share of taxes PLUS I serve all my 2.5 years + 10 years reservist without one deferment. So don't talk to me about responsibility.

It is the problem of the system. But who developed and implemented this system?

Majullah Singapura.

Its true that the NS men are disenfranchised and lose out to their female and malaysian counterpart in career advancement. This is hard to swallow.

On the bright side for some, people who survived NS is like a right of passage into manhood. The 2.5 years of shit in NS is actually character building and may equip the survivor with lifeskills to deal with the hardships of life to come.

Yeh. Hardships of life like losing out to our female and malaysian counterpart in career advancement.

Posted by aaronkwok* on 28 April, 2009 - 11:43pm

You can build character WITHOUT NS. Different ways of doing things.

Oh, you can also collapse during IPPT due to NS. Building character is not useful when you're dead.

Majullah Singapura.

I do agree with his point on citizenship easily given and the part when he will lose out to other male PR or employment pass holders. However I do not agree with his stance on singling out Singaporean women as well saying that they have it easier than the men, that is just plain whining.

Posted by doter* on 28 April, 2009 - 1:59pm

I agree in general with his points. However I'd like to point out in particular why the hell NSMen need to notify overseas trips beforehand. Can't we just do it at the exit point itself? It's a stupid policy.

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 28 April, 2009 - 2:34pm

" It is not working effectively and efficiently to deliver a robust defence posture for the amount of resources we pour in."

How did this wonderboy draw this conclusion? From his arse?

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 28 April, 2009 - 2:51pm

Yes, would you like to examine it for yourself.

It is my opinion, do you have your own learned opinion beyond making disparaging remarks about one's anatomy?

No ns.
Get bullied by msia or indo
U want meh??

Posted by Elite* on 28 April, 2009 - 6:03pm

Nah, that's ok. We get plenty bullied by our own government already.

A bit of foreign bullying won't hurt (and may even help since it'll be the top dogs who will be getting more bullied than the other dogs).

Who do you think will draw more attention, the (rich) politicians or the common man in the street?

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 28 April, 2009 - 7:20pm

The problem isn't NS. The problem is best shown with this question- When we serve NS what exactly are we protecting/defending?
- HDB flats on perma-loan mortgage terms?
- A profiteering system of "public" transport?
- The right for a select few to vote their leaders in GRCs that are contested?
- Unilateral decision making in parliament when it comes to instituting laws contrary to the constitution?
- Unilateral parliamentary voting for self serving pay?
- The Kings, Mandarins and ruling elites?
- The "foreign talent"?

Malaysia has the bumiputra (sons of the soil) policy to protect "their own"- yes limited to malays but still something.

What exactly do we have?

Yes- ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country BUT:
For the United States:
- People have the right to vote
- Party representation WHEN they seek it
- Freedom (yes, even the freedom to act irresponsibly)
- Leaders that consider protectionism when things look bad enough (this is an economic debate I know but the heart is there. PAP would just tell the unemployed and disenfranchised to embrace the winds of globalisation).
- A constitution that makes it legal for you to remove a tyrannical government with the arms they allow you to keep if need be

What has PAP enshrined for you that makes them so worth fighting for and defending?

Living in Singapore demands hard choices. If you're born here, you do not have a choice. Geographically, it is a desirable place for the conduct of business and criminal activity. Politically, nobody is going to take care of Singapore but Singaporeans. In practical terms, nobody is going to defend Singapore but Singaporeans. The UN is good for collecting membership dues and that's pretty much it.

Honestly, there is not an overwhelming reason to move to Singapore. City life, low crime, blah blah blah - there are many other cities in the world with the same thing. Therefore, the unfortunate trade off is that to get people to move here, you have to essentially bribe them to come here - give them perks so that they live here better than they would in their home country or elsewhere. For developing countries this means a waterproof roof, for developed countries this means neighborhoods and schools 80% of Singaporeans never see.

Democracy in the US is overstated and overrated. Politicians represent themselves and their reelection. If the voters benefit, they benefit incidentally. Having been Stateside for almost 20 years, I can write page after page on this. Leaders consider "protectionism" not to protect jobs, but to protect the unions. For example, the teachers unions contribute more to political campaigns than the oil companies.

In Singapore, elected officials get paid highly. In the US, you make money by running for election. Essentially, you set up your political campaign (your company), and loan it your own money at an interest rate that you set (as high as you want). You collect campaign contributions to "pay off" the campaign debt to the creditor (yourself). However, you don't ever pay off the principal and in fact keep trying to increase it - this guarantees you have a steady stream of income to yourself as the campaign indefinitely tries to pay you back.

Think about this. The Mayor of Los Angeles, a rather incompetent lawyer who did not manage to pass the California Bar exam, gets paid a couple hundred thousand grand a year, but bought a $4.5 million condo. That math makes no sense.

Politicians and political parties do not represent the people in anyway, shape or form. An illegal immigrant from Mexico pays discounted in-State tuition and CalState Universities, but an American citizen from Arizona would have to pay full out-of-state tuition. Who is the political party representing here? Illegal Mexicans or Americans?

Nor is there that much freedom in the US. 50% of my income gets taxed - that's half my freedom taken away. Regardless of what they do with it, the point is, it is my money. There is no freedom without respect for private property. If I want to burn it, it's my choice. That is the definition of freedom.

The 2nd Ammendment right to bear arms, are you kidding me? Have you tried to buy a gun in the State of California? Try getting a Concealed Carry in San Francisco. Also, you have to drive to Nevada so you can buy a magazine that will hold more than 10 rounds.

Despite the ruling in DC v. Heller, individual States and cities still do everything they can to make it difficult for you to own a gun or concealed carry claiming the decision was in Federal Court. During Katrina, the city ordered the police to confiscate weapons from all registered gun owners in New Orleans.

It is perfectly fine to !#@$ and moan about life in Singapore. There is a lot to be angry about. But to naively and blindly point to another country and say it is better is a great disservice to the truth.

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 29 April, 2009 - 1:14pm

You must be one of those republican wing nuts, disfranchised by the democratic victory and feeling marginalized. Despair not. If you don't like the USA, the Pee Sai of the East will welcome you back with open arms.

And where did you get your nonsensical half-truths from? Rush Limbaugh? Fox News? Your red neck friends in the NRA?

Posted by what truth?* on 30 April, 2009 - 11:01am

Hi Anon 1:14,

The United States is definitely not perfect. Neither are your politicians beyond TVland's The West Wing. Fact is, there's not a single mention about the "greatness" of the US.

Conceal and Carry license? Please- If the state has turned tyrannical. You'd be carrying your arms in public and in full view. Beyond police, secret service, private investigators and federal agents, why would you want a conceal and carry license?

Want to know what Singapore has? Assume our country had gone from benevolent dictatorship to pure tyranny- We can't even criticize the government in full view of the public. Yes, no carrying free speech in Singapore. Conceal your lips and your thoughts if you live here.

In addition, I'm trained in small arms. You want to carry more than 10 rounds? Are you looking to start a war? Or in self defense, 10 rounds into 10 assailants? Are you in a gang? You only need one round. FYI .357 - 8 rounds. .32 - 5 to 6 rounds. How much stopping power do you need?

I hear you- 50% income tax. Sure, it sucks, you've worked hard, by God's grace and personal intellect, you've reached an income bracket that forces you to pay for the millions of other US citizens taking unemployment benefits and healthcare. I'm feel horrible for you but personally, shouldn't you be somewhat secure that should a change of fortune sweep you into unemployment, you have a social safety net to keep you from collecting newspapers and selling recycled tin cans.

Singapore IS wonderful. I love the CPF. The "indirect" tax that the government can repeatedly shift the goalposts and regulations for withdrawal. Lost your job in Singapore? Tough. Want to draw a little of your CPF to tide you over? Suck eggs, we need to bail out US banks and rebalance GIC accounts.

Non subsidised university education? Guess what? Mainland chinese students come here on FULL SCHOLARSHIPS, serve none of the national service AND use Singapore as a stepping stone to your "crappy" US of A. These "scholar" immigrants starve locals out of places in the local varsities.

Politicians are self serving? No kidding. I don't recall mentioning anywhere how glorious and noble your civil servants are. I do know this though- the media is free to expose them if they're corrupt. Not to mention, so far, in terms of noble behavior Obama is looking pretty good (can't say much about his economic policies though).

The mayor of Los Angeles bought a $4.5 million condo? You might want to look at the many ministers in a country smaller than many US states that own BUILDINGS in Australia. I won't mention who, but you can find out. The internet is amazing.

Democracy is overrated till you lose it. I would love that Singaporeans benefit incidentally. By the way, getting our Shoeboxes in the sky upgraded, not too great an incidental benefit. And gasp! Who are the unions protecting? The workers? The workers are citizens no?

Come to Singapore, come become an expandable economic "digit". See if you still find Singapore worth defending. Please ELUCIDATE- what about Singapore is worth defending. Just one item.

edit: EXPENDABLE not expandable (though we do get stretched) :P

Addendum: I do agree Anon that there's a lot of bullshit in the US. But it's still better than what we got. Your media acts to limit the worst excesses of your political elite at least. At worst, even if your media is self-serving right wing supporters, you still have enough individuals to whistleblow and further their own agendas (and that's a kind of check and balance no?)

As the army saying goes ....

Suck thumb, loh!

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 30 April, 2009 - 1:23am

Perce, what you had posted above comparing the US and Singapore is so depressing for me.. :'(

but thanks..

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 30 April, 2009 - 9:02am

There's still hope. Use your vote wisely if you're in a voting district.

Here's why:
- The opposition (save for Kenneth J - economics guru of sorts for the reform party) is fairly lacking in policy making skills
- I do agree with PAP that opposition is "not credible" in a sense
- BUT how many of recent PAP policies have been credible? What have they done lately?
MOST IMPORTANTLY
- The civil service is run COMPETENTLY with multiple redundancies.
- SG won't fall apart overnight

ONE IMPORTANT THOUGHT TO CONSIDER:
- It's not the lack of $$ that makes it difficult for the PAP to find leaders and new blood. HAVE YOU EVER CONSIDERED, that the true leaders might find underhanded political assassination and gerrymandering distasteful? People can disagree on principle alone and choose not to serve.

Now imagine:
- How many new leaders would speak up in a society where free speech is possible.
- In the cacophony of voices, how many new ideas will arise?
- How many new solutions?
- How many alternative viewpoints?
- Finally a Singapore for Singaporeans.
- A Singapore that's filled with the same sense of unity during the birth of our independence.
- A Singapore worth fighting for, EVEN IF you disagree with the guy standing next to you. Simply because in your hearts, YOU KNOW this disagreement arises out of a passion of wanting Singapore to be strong.

Majulah

I'm a jobless local for more than 11 months and it's the most tormenting experience in life.

Despite
being a healthy man in late 20s, educated/skilled, no criminal record,
countless job applications and interviews (mostly from self-search),
approached/contacted goverment agencies and bodies,
I remain jobless.

Apparently, Singapore employers practice racism (against Malay Muslims) and favoritism (for immigrants/foreigners)

I'm disgusted to know that many immigrants/foreigners (especially from Philippines, Indonesia, China, India) conversing bad English with their country accent. Yet, they're working in mid-level sectors like HR, IT and services.

Moreover, many immigrants/foreigners do not really understand our national anthem Majulah Singapura (Malay language). I'm neither an American, British nor Aussie. But I can certainly understand their national anthem in their language (English).

The discrimination towards men in Singapore is not just limited to the opportunity cost due to their NS obligations.

Join us and discuss this and other issues here on Singapore Men's Rights Watch on Facebook.
http://mensrightswatch.cjb.net/

Posted by Alexk* on 1 May, 2009 - 3:41pm

It has been some time since I came to this site...and what a disappointment! Bloody old story retold! And how narrow-minded an issue! You got to see the bigger picture, man! If you don't serve the country, who will?

P.S.: Go on, delete my comment.

Just... sucks.

Waste time, and so many fatal accidents of very funny nature. So much issues in life and yet, still RT, in-camp and all those... Any proper compensation? Any leeway? If I were to go to China to shoot anything less than a year, as a Singaporean, I have to bloody hell come back for RT or in-camp! It's as if everywhere in this world has only Spring all year round... ...

Conscription is a policy of the past, an old world where many activities are concentrated in Singapore. But in such an environment and multi-issues of modern days, there is a need to revise the need of reservist and NS.

Reservist should be very flexible, NS should be highly proper and carefully run. How can we proceed on in disrupting civilians' lives in such a manner? And I was shocked that some (ignorant) people in SAF are very rigid and demanding on rules when... come on, the world is not about SAF! Many people have to travel, have to seek opportunities, have their lives, and the state's job is to ensure Singaporeans contribute while not harming their interests instead of asking for ever more understanding.

I mean, who tried understanding us anyway?

How can we have so many sessions of RTs for one failed IPPT? Can someone up there do something about this?

A bit mobilisation here, a bit In-camp that month, then RTs then and now, how to plan anything not resolving around SAF?

Please don't quote some flowery excuses... pragmatically speaking, there must be a balance here. And shockingly, equipments are not provided by the states...?! One pair of boots is already $100++! Is that conscription or forced demand?

My 2cts.

Scope.

Haha! You losers! Whining all day long but what can you do about it?

Just bend over and take it. You have been so emasculated that all you dare to do is to whine about it online. Why don't you do something?

Here's a tip. Vote with your feet. If you think other countries are better, migrate. Why stay here and damn your children to the same fate?

And those who like NS, well, some people enjoy getting screwed. I"m not gonna judge.

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 7 May, 2009 - 3:51pm

Well, being an NSmen myself, I can certainly relate to those who resent being one. As the above poster has said, a good option would be to migrate. 2/2.5 years of your years already has been wasted away (if you think it has, of which I definitely do), not counting all the other NSman activities. If you think in this way, then all I can say is don't let your son's time be wasted too.

I know it is easy to say that the grass is greener on the other side of the fence. But really, each individual should decide what they want out of their lives and I would find it very unlikely that this small 710.2 km sq of land is everyone's idea of the greenest pasture on earth. It isn't for me, anyways. Assuming loyalty to a place just because you were born there is just not right. Home is where the heart is, and for me, it just isn't in Singapore.

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 29 June, 2009 - 9:21pm

Stop discriminating against us foreigners. I am a PR and I love PAP and their pro-foreigner policies!

Suck it up. Whine...whine...whine.

Just on a quick note... Do you actually think anyone would fight an actual war and defend Singapore even if we served 2/2.5 years of army? Honestly? Would you?

I wouldn't even think of defending this country after serving my NS! So what if you conscript all males in Singapore... You have to be delusional to think you can even rely on an army of Singaporeans that were forced to fight...

$400 a mth is plain exploitation...

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 4 August, 2009 - 8:40pm