September 02, 2008

Political openness - for PAP only

Andrew Loh said:

On Sunday, the PAP Community Foundation organised a ‘PAP carnival’ at West Coast Park. This was reported by the Straits Times on its front page, with a big picture of PM Lee on a bicycle. The event would be nothing out of the ordinary if not for one small detail: outdoor events by political parties are banned – or at least that is what the PAP Government itself says. This was explained in no uncertain terms in Parliament last year (2007) by the Senior Minister of State for Law and Home Affairs, Professor Ho Peng Kee, and carried in news reports by our mainstream press.

The ban, said Minister Ho, is a ‘longstanding one’ because ‘outdoor gatherings by parties have the potential to cause a public disturbance.’ (Straits Times).

Ho explained this in his reply to questions from the Workers’ Party MPs in Parliament, who asked why the WP’s application to hold a cycling event at East Coast Park was rejected by the police.

Recommended by at82: "If our society is ruled by two different sets of laws – or laws applied selectively - for different people or political parties, it cannot but fracture and disintegrate. "

Link

Submitted by at82 on September 02//9:18pm and published by tinkertailor :: 3854 reads | trackback
Comments 6

aiyah PAP can do what it wants one what! now then you know?

Posted by kukuchiao* on 5 September, 2008 - 7:21am

Well under the law, PCF is a separate legal entity from the PAP. So technically it was not a political party event. WP was applying as a political party.

call a spade a spade.

Posted by kukuchiao* on 5 September, 2008 - 2:22pm

"Well under the law, PCF is a separate legal entity from the PAP. So technically it was not a political party event. WP was applying as a political party."

What law ? Can you even use a Kangaroo Law ? Why not use Junta Law in Burma as well, killing all opposition party with guns ? PAP create their own Kangaroo Law, and you now talk law... Call a spade a spade. Don't insult rule of Law with Kangaroo law.
You will have done better quoting

"Well under the KANGAROO law, PCF is a separate legal entity from the PAP. So technically it was not a political party event even though PCF has PAP as the prefix. WP was applying as a political party."

You need to question what law rather than just accept any kangaroo law as law. Sister-In-Law ?

We suspect you as a kangaroo as well.

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 6 September, 2008 - 9:36am

You can't trust the PAP anymore ....

Posted by Anonymous Coward* on 9 September, 2008 - 11:48am

As usual different laws for different people , and the use of the law for political ends