November 07, 2006

Pot calling the kettle black

feelingsleepy said:

If NUS expects its alumni to give generously to the needy students, they first have to stop their own opulent spending and wastage. The present situation is akin to a rich tycoon appealing for donations to feed its pets, because his own money has to go towards beatifying his home, and building dog runs, and new kennels. The food? Nope, that's for the public to contribute.

Even in asking for donations, there is wastage. "Last month, it sent out appeal letters to 170,000 alumni...", "Last year, it employed a direct marketing company to do the calling." 170,000 letters at 22 cents each - that's $37,400! Granted, Singpost probably charges a discounted rate for them, but still, it would not be a small amount. And paying a direct marketing company? That can probably fund one or two students already? All this money could have gone to the needy students, instead of making a big display of asking alumni to help.

Recommended by feelingsleepy: "It is ridiculous for NUS to keep whining about its alumni not donating money to help its needy students, when they are wasting their own money on unnecessary upgrading and "fund-raising" costs. All that money could and should go to the needy students!"

Link

Submitted by feelingsleepy on November 07//3:24pm and published by shianux, LMD :: 1504 reads | trackback (2)
Comments 16

How many NUS alumni or students were approached? How many agreed to volunteer?

If that number is at all similar to the number who agreed to donate, I'm not surprised that they needed a direct marketing contractor.

Posted by Anonymous Coward** on 7 November, 2006 - 10:00pm

And let us not forget stupid biz school recruitment ads...

Posted by sambasam* on 7 November, 2006 - 10:04pm

Trackback from Simple is the Reason of My Heart: There are things that Money cannot Buy:

On Alumni Donations in Singapore and Passion about Government and Country, and how they are linked...

another NUS article???

Posted by smooo* on 7 November, 2006 - 11:27pm

I read a recent article in the straits times by NUS that buildings can save millions in electric bills if the energy is conserved...

the irony is in NUS i always notice that some inconsiderate ppl will leave the doors open, causing the air con to leak...i always close these doors as it irritates me to no end that energy is wasted for nothing. perhaps the NUS committe can look into this. most magnetically locked doors will beep if not closed after some time...perhaps they can set this for all the common corridor doors...

i received a letter from the NUS alumni soliciting for donations too! and i'm not even from NUS.... talk about wasting money huh

Posted by maxine* on 8 November, 2006 - 1:47am

Did you tell them to get out of your uncaring face?

NUS say that at Harvard or Yale, 4 in 10 graduates donate. But they also admit that the Singapore government subsidises their cost by 70% . Are we comparing apples to apples here? Or just comparing apples to lemons, just because they are fruit?

Another figure that does not make sense to me is that $1,500 "buys" one bursary. $256,000 "buys" 20 bursaries, and 12 in perpetuity (whatever that is). When you do the math, 20 bursaries cost $30,000. The "12 in perpetuity" costs $226,00, or about $18,800 each. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?

What surprises me most is that despite having thousands and thousands of graduates, there are only 1,452 alumni. So what's broken here? The students? The graduates? Or the alumni?

I'm sure they can raise funds successfully. Just follow the NKF model.

Posted by cmt* on 8 November, 2006 - 5:20am

By the way, direct marketing is one of the best ways to get results. You need to spend money to make money.

Posted by sambasam* on 8 November, 2006 - 6:08am

unless the alumni felt a sense of belonging - and still see themselves as who they are as a result of the school, then yes, perhaps they'd donate. But seriously, the school seems to me like they're more interested in impressing the world and making more and more money than taking care of the students.

but then again, i'm not from NUS so what do I know.

just being the devil's advocate here. well, i suppose NUS and NTU has always been trying to keep up with their 'glam' image? in a way, its always been their style to be extravagant in whatever they do. even in this matter, perhaps they value their image over the fund-raising?

and in a more extreme view, perhaps it was all a farce. just trying to portray that they care for their students. when in actual fact, they couldnt care less.

just my two-cents worth.

It certainly looks like they couldn't care less. With so much money to spend on everything including fund-raising, why can't they give it directly to the students in need?

Posted by Anonymous Coward>>>* on 8 November, 2006 - 5:57pm

That would defeat the purpose of the fund raising
-
`I want to assure you that nus is committed to ensuring no student we admit will be denied our quality education because of financial difficulties`

visceral, don't you find that tone.. familiar? sounds like a Certain political party's election speech..

I would not want to equate butchers with hand puppets
-
`Also absent from the group of core statutory board and GLC directors are all the heads of higher education statutory boards except for Nus, Ntu and the Nie. No polytechnic principals are present` Governance in Singapore, Ross Worthington