May 26, 2006

The Guitar Shop Gal

»

girlwithballs said:

Attractiveness is something really hard to grasp, and even harder to react to when you're hit by its arrows. Grinning uncontrollably, stammering, trying to avert the other party's eyes...come on, don't shy don't shy, we've all been there.

Recommended by Anonymous Coward: "Everyone is a sucker for...the aesthetics in life."

Link

Submitted by Anonymous Coward on May 25//10:34pm and published by LMD, Angelique :: 2912 reads | trackback
Comments 15

NPNT. (No Picture No Talk) lolz...

Posted by Bardic Circle 3 on 26 May, 2006 - 10:41pm

this kind of post also can be tomorrowed?

Posted by Anon* on 27 May, 2006 - 1:44am

Yeah I'm not sure why exactly this is Tomorrow-worthy.

Posted by UsDude Z* on 27 May, 2006 - 2:59am

i'm not exactly sure why this isnt.

Posted by tinkertailor on 27 May, 2006 - 10:12am

sigh, you just can't please everyone.

imho, a good read with decent grammar which is written in the singapore context is tomorrow-able. the above post falls into that category!

Posted by hucks* on 27 May, 2006 - 2:40pm

imho in view of the local population problem, any attempt at boosting the pathetic fertility rate, however vague, is commendable.

heh heh heh

Posted by Angelique on 27 May, 2006 - 6:25pm

it is not expedient to have children in a feudal society, unless you are confident that australia is going to welcome your family with open arms
-
`To do so would be unfair to others who have put their personal aspirations and goals on hold to serve NS when called upon to do so`

Posted by visceral on 27 May, 2006 - 7:49pm

Given her pen name I think the writer of the post is a woman actually.

Posted by UsDude Z* on 29 May, 2006 - 9:58am

Is there no other interesting post by SG bloggers?

If based on Angelique's arguement that anything that boost the fertility rate of SG, then I think tomorrow.sg will be pretty busy during the PC show next week where many SG blogger will be posting vague comments about which salesgal quite good looking. Is tomorrow.sg going to accept all those submittion?

In fact, I often see blog posting by teenage boys n gals commenting that they saw a cute boy/gal on train/bus/etc..... Is tomorrow.sg going to accept all of them too?

I asked how come this post can be accepted not because I'm trying to find trouble with the editor team. But if we keep allowing such vague and non-important post to be tomorrowed, then the standard of tomorrow.sg will be down the drain.

If the editor team feels that such post is tomorrow-worthy, then I rest my case.

Posted by Anon - 27 May 2007 @ 1.44am* on 28 May, 2006 - 4:58pm

The best we can expect of this debacle would be comic relief

Posted by visceral on 28 May, 2006 - 8:42pm

wah lau ...comprain so much..if you can write better, then submit your writings lor.

Don't debase others when you got nothing better to prove.

Posted by anon2* on 29 May, 2006 - 5:07pm

I know I got nothing better to write/contribute. That why I didn't contribute.
You mean must have something better to contribute in order to give comments?

Question of the day: Are football commentors good at playing football? lol.....

Posted by Anon3* on 31 May, 2006 - 6:58pm

May be not, but they are paid to comment.

Posted by Anonymous Spectator* on 31 May, 2006 - 8:59pm

Anon2: why aren't we allowed to comment? if we can't comment, then WHY is there a commenting system here?

Posted by Anon* on 31 May, 2006 - 10:30pm

I think what he/she meant was the difference between the sensible/constructive and nonsensical comments. I think only ar...

Posted by My take* on 31 May, 2006 - 11:04pm